@JasonGraham99 asked:
Why are there so many different math strategies that exist today
that (didn't)? exist when I grew up? And more
importantly why do we need the different strategies - a Devil's advocate question…sorry
but I wonder why. Sometimes we teach 5 different ways to get to the same answer
(lattice, partial products etc..) Why? - again Devil’s advoc) But I am serious.
Does having multiple ways of learning math confuse learners? Or open minds?
This is our last day of Term 3 - but we work up to the last bell of the day so I am keen to give this some thought.
Or better still, get the kids to do the thinking.
Here is what my Grade 2 class had to say about why we learn to do the same thing in multiple ways:
Pictures can be used to help you if you can’t read numbers.
And then I asked them if having multiple methods was confusing:
And finally I asked if they thought if multiple strategies actually helped open their minds:
I was impressed with what they had to say. It was certainly an interesting question for me to ask them.
I also have a few ideas of my own:
I always like to compare life to a game of golf. The more clubs I have in my bag, the better equipped I am for the many problems and hazards I will face out there. I might be pretty good with the driver off the tee, but the driver will be no use to me when I end up in the sand. The more clubs I have, the better chance I have.
I think the same is true for maths. If I know multiple strategies, I can select the most appropriate for the context. Do I want a quick method? - use mental calculation.
Do I want a detailed result to many decimal points? - use a calculator.
Do I want to show my thinking to someone else? - use a picture or diagram.
Many of us will remember being taught a method or process in mathematics, such as for multiplication or division, but few of us will have been shown WHY we do it that way. This teaches us to be "superstitious" mathematicians - we do it this way just because we always have.
Learning multiple strategies for an operation without explaining the WHY and developing the connections simply compounds confusion for kids. I agree with Jason's question - it is confusing - if there is no explanation.
But it is also liberating and "mind-opening" when students are able to make connections, to join up their learning and find relationships. And they can do this if we are able to help them understand a variety of different strategies and how they are related.
If a student understands the distributive law, they can appreciate a number of different methods of multiplication. Vertical algorithms, lattice method, arrays - all have a link to the distributive law. However, memorising a list of different strategies is not much help by itself - it really does get back to knowing WHY we do something.
Finally, it can be fun to know different ways to do the same thing. It can be boring doing the same thing all the time - variety of the spice of life.
So I would encourage teachers and students to play with maths, to have fun and find new ways to do things just because they can.
Hopefully this makes some sense and answers a few of those questions from Jason.
And what a great way to finish the term!
Now I've got to get home and dust off the golf clubs...
This is our last day of Term 3 - but we work up to the last bell of the day so I am keen to give this some thought.
Or better still, get the kids to do the thinking.
Here is what my Grade 2 class had to say about why we learn to do the same thing in multiple ways:
So
we can make things easier. Say everyone’s thought of one way but someone thinks
of a new way.
Having
different ways is what we need to do because in maths you need different
techniques.
You’ll learn more.
You
don’t want to just get the same answer everytime.
Because
it’s really fun to have different ways. It can make it easier for little kids.
So people get more knowledge.
If
you don’t know one strategy you can go on to the next one. One maths question
can help you with another one.
There
could be simpler ways so we need to keep looking for them.
And then I asked them if having multiple methods was confusing:
I think it would be really confusing if you had lots of different
answers.
It gets confusing if the same question is asked in lots of
different ways.
Yes and no. You know that having lots of answers is good because
if you don't get one then you might get another.
It’s confusing when there are no pictures.
It’s confusing if the extra ways of doing it are harder or have
more steps.
And finally I asked if they thought if multiple strategies actually helped open their minds:
Depends
on how hard the question is.
Having
more ideas of different ways of doing things can help you do other things.
Knowing
how to do a little sum can help you in future learn how to do a big sum. A
little mouse can one day help a big lion.
If
one way is easy for you to do it opens your mind up and helps you understand
other questions.
It’s
helping your brain because your brain gets smarter.
It
helps because you see those different ways because you can choose which one to
do. If you look at a question and you’re stuck on it you could choose one of
those ways.
I
think it’s confusing because you don’t know which one is the best. One way
could take too long.
I was impressed with what they had to say. It was certainly an interesting question for me to ask them.
I also have a few ideas of my own:
1. Golf
I always like to compare life to a game of golf. The more clubs I have in my bag, the better equipped I am for the many problems and hazards I will face out there. I might be pretty good with the driver off the tee, but the driver will be no use to me when I end up in the sand. The more clubs I have, the better chance I have.
I think the same is true for maths. If I know multiple strategies, I can select the most appropriate for the context. Do I want a quick method? - use mental calculation.
Do I want a detailed result to many decimal points? - use a calculator.
Do I want to show my thinking to someone else? - use a picture or diagram.
2. Why?
Many of us will remember being taught a method or process in mathematics, such as for multiplication or division, but few of us will have been shown WHY we do it that way. This teaches us to be "superstitious" mathematicians - we do it this way just because we always have.
Learning multiple strategies for an operation without explaining the WHY and developing the connections simply compounds confusion for kids. I agree with Jason's question - it is confusing - if there is no explanation.
But it is also liberating and "mind-opening" when students are able to make connections, to join up their learning and find relationships. And they can do this if we are able to help them understand a variety of different strategies and how they are related.
If a student understands the distributive law, they can appreciate a number of different methods of multiplication. Vertical algorithms, lattice method, arrays - all have a link to the distributive law. However, memorising a list of different strategies is not much help by itself - it really does get back to knowing WHY we do something.
3. Fun
Finally, it can be fun to know different ways to do the same thing. It can be boring doing the same thing all the time - variety of the spice of life.
So I would encourage teachers and students to play with maths, to have fun and find new ways to do things just because they can.
Hopefully this makes some sense and answers a few of those questions from Jason.
And what a great way to finish the term!
Now I've got to get home and dust off the golf clubs...